This guide is designed to provide a very brief introduction to tools and resources that may be useful for you as you begin work on your critical synthesis.
Each critical synthesis project is unique and not all tools and resources will apply to your project. Please feel free to email me at karen.tatarka@uconn.edu for any questions related to your specific project, or complete the Critical Synthesis Intake Form.
For a more thorough guide to Education resources at UConn Library, please visit the Education Subject Guide.
There are many types of recognized research reviews that can apply to your critical synthesis. To help you better understand and identify the right review for your project, UCLA Library provides an overview of the most popular types of reviews.
Examples of different types of reviews:
Sample Critical Literature Review
Kirkwood, Adrian and Price, Linda (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1) pp. 6–36. https://oro.open.ac.uk/36675/7/TEL%20in%20Higher%20Education-What%20is%20enhanced%20and%20how%20do%20we%20know.pdf
Sample Scoping Review
National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), Applied Engineering Management Corporation (AEM), Center for Parent Information & Resources (CPIR), National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE), WestEd, Kristin K. Liu, Martha L. Thurlow, Mari Quanbeck, Jessica A. Bowman, & Amy Riegelman. (2024). Universal design and K-12 academic assessments: A scoping review of the literature. NCEO Report 442. In National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.umn.edu/docs/OnlinePubs/NCEOReport442.pdf
Sample Meta-Analysis
Moore, T. R., Lee, S., Freeman, R., Mahmoundi, M., Dimian, A., Riegelman, A., & Simacek, J. J. (2024). A meta-analysis of treatment for self-injurious behavior in children and adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Behavior Modification, 48(2), 216–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455231218742 (UConn Access)
Sample Systematic Review
Langham-Putrow A, Bakker C, Riegelman A (2021) Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLoS ONE 16(6): e0253129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253129
If you would like to suggest the library purchase a particular book or other resource, please use the UConn Library Purchase Request form.
Requests for purchase are reviewed by subject specialists using the Library's Collection Development Policy. Please note that items may take up to 8 weeks to arrive, with certain requests taking longer.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
| Details and Exceptions